Thursday, 28 April 2011

Night of the Demon

Name That Rune

Night of the Demon
(aka Curse of the Demon US) UK 1957
Directed by Jacques Tourneur
Screening as a double bill in a pub
as part of the Classic Horror Campaign.

I’m not much for big celebrations of Easter. In fact, I would go so far as to say that, for me personally, there’s only two really great things about Easter. Number One is I can stay away from work and be with family or friends and Number Two would be that it’s an excuse for my yearly ritualistic screening of It’s The Easter Beagle, Charlie Brown.

This year, however, my Good Friday wasn’t just that... it was actually a really great Friday. This is because the Classic Horror Campaign (a campaign to bring back the classic, late night BBC2 horror double bills from the 70s and 80s... check out their website right here) had organised a pub screening of one of my favourite British made horror movies Night of the Demon and also a classic Hammer Horror which I don’t think I’d seen before, Vampire Circus.

The venue and organisation of said event were great and the relaxed atmosphere, comfy sofas and knowledge that you were watching these classic movies with like-minded individuals did a lot to make this run-in to Easter truly one to remember.

Warning! Okay... so this review is only about Night of the Demon and, because I want to reiterate some points about it I probably already made in a review of another movie, this one will have some pretty big spoilerage in it... so desist from reading this right now if you’ve never seen this or the slightly truncated and alternate US version Curse of the Demon.

Night of the Demon is a 1957 movie made in Britain and based on the M. R. James short ghost story Casting the Runes. It was directed by the legendary Jacques Tourneur who was certainly no stranger to the horror genre as he had directed three of the best of producer Val Lewton’s famous and critically acclaimed RKO low-budget alternatives to the Universal Horror cycle in the 1940s... notably the original version of Cat People plus The Leopard Man and I Walked With A Zombie.

Now this isn’t actually, when you get right down to it, exactly a faithful adaptation of the short to be honest... but like other less than faithful movie adaptations (I might mention Jaws or Blade Runner) it plays around with concepts and ideas which are thrown up by the original source material and manages to be a movie that conjures up a chilling atmosphere which is reminiscent of the spirit of the original and, quite apart from this, is certainly one of the most watchable and entertaining British horror movies of all time.

Like the original short story, the movie takes up the idea of a demon coming to destroy the possessor of a piece of paper with a runic curse on it. Once the initially unknowing owner of said piece of runic scribble is aware of this, the movie becomes an exercise in a) the characters progression from “do I really believe this” to “bugger this I’m in trouble here” and b) how do I pass the curse back to the originator without him being aware that I’ve done it before the demon comes to take me.

The original story was a small character sketch on fear with the presence of an actual demon implied but not actually verified by the writer... a kind of “make your own mind up” conclusion as to whether the death of a character in the short story was down to a demonic force or whether it was a freakish and coincidental accident caused by the act of fleeing a suspected reality, in a self-fulfilling prophecy kind of way.

The movie plays things a little less vaguely with a pre-credits sequence that includes a scene which shows the demon coming to kill the last victim of the runic symbols in a quite charming "Ray Harryhausen-style" stop motion animation. I understand that the director did not want to make the demon implicit himself and hated the scenes where the demon is actually shown and I guess this would in fact fit in with his modus operandi from when he was working for Lewton over at RKO in the decade before. Still, whether the director wanted it there or not, it’s there and it’s curiously effective for something which is so obviously a stop motion element to the movie. The demonic murder itself is called into question because the car of the victim is electrocuted trying to flee the monster in question.

The very real villain of the piece, however, is a black magician called Dr. Julian Karswell who may or may not have been based on the real-life Alesteir Crowley, played by Niall MacGinnis who really gives a brilliant performance in the role. An absolutely charming character who will be quite happy to provide you with some charming chit-chat over tea and cake before slipping you a runic scroll and setting a demon on you.

The main protagonist is Dr. John Holden, played by Dana Andrews who was presumably cast to ensure the film’s distribution in the US. He plays a doctor who has journeyed from America to disprove Karswell’s claim of being a witch and thus finds himself, cynically, on the receiving end of one of Mr. Karswell’s nasty runes. His romantic interest is the daughter of the previous victim of one of Karswell’s demons played by Peggy Cummins... but she doesn’t really seem to do that much but provide a female Mulder to Dana Winter’s skeptical Scully.

By the way, if any of the plotline to this movie is starting to sound just a little too familiar to fans of modern horror cinema, that’s because this is basically the same storyline (with a few modern adjustments) of Sam Raimi’s Drag Me To Hell a few years ago... I haven’t actually come across anything where the makers of Drag Me To Hell have admitted that their movie is a direct remake of Night of the Demon... or even “inspired by” M. R. James Casting The Runes... but it does seem pretty obvious to me that this movie was just a thinly and inadequately disguised remake of Night of the Demon. Still, Drag Me To Hell was a pretty good horror movie too... my review of it is here.

Asides from the opening confrontation with Karswell and the aforementioned and subsequent death of victim number one at the hands of the demon, the movie keeps a brisk but discrete pace and keeps everything else under wraps while exploring the psychological effects of the events of a man’s death foretold on th characters. It’s only towards the last half an hour or so, after Last of the Summer Wine actor Brian Wilde throws himself to his death out of a window while reliving a demonic encounter in a hypnotically induced trance that things begin to kick back into high gear with a cat wrestling scene, a pursuit by a shiny bright demonic light through a forest (including brilliant Michael Bentine’s Potty Time invisible creature footsteps) and a race along some train tracks involving the runic paper and the death by one of the characters at the hands of the stop-motion demon. The railway track setting, of course, means the injuries sustained by this character can be explained by a train having rolled over him... something that Raimi used a couple of years ago as the scene of the final denouement of Drag Me To Hell. Hmmm... wonder where he got that idea from.

Shot in a stark black and white which perfectly evokes an eerie mood, Night of the Demon is the perfect film for fans and students of the Great British Horror Movie and I would heartily recommend this movie to people who fit that description. A shorter cut-down version of the film was released in the US as Curse Of The Demon and at one time I understood that this version was made from different takes of the same scenes... although I can’t seem to verify that claim at the present and I’ve never bothered to watch that version (as yet) so I can’t honestly say it is or it isn't.

The second half of this double bill, Vampire Circus, will be reviewed soonest!


  1. Hi Nuts,
    A enjoyed your view of this film at the Good Friday shindig very enjoyable movie to open up hopefully more double bills in the future. I have also gathered that you really enjoyed Drag Me To Hell too but I have to say you are giving your age away with the Michael Bentine reference Hmmm... wonder where he got that idea from.


  2. Could be................


  3. The American version cuts some 'lull' and 'driving time' scenes, and then inserts the two full-demon-on-display footage which is, admittedly, only 40-60 seconds each. I don't believe any dialog or even meaningful-glances between characters are lost.

    This is a favorite film-set and I like to see the arguments emerge over Displaying Demon vs Not-Displaying. Personally, if there's a monster, I wanna set it. Early and often. No steekin' CLOVERFIELD where we have 102 seconds of monster in a 94-minute teen-angst soap opera - SHOW THE MONSTER!

    These two DEMON films give fans the chance to see for themselvess, and I don't think they're short-changed either way.

    Dana Andrews was probably cast to 'ensure American interest' but I wonder how the filmmakers could think American audiences wouldn't clamor for another Tourneur film? Dana's "expert on British Lore" character is so far-fetched, and then to use Dana "Flattest, Most Monotoned Actor Ever" Andrews?!!

    Curious choice but the film's too good to let him dull it down.

    1. Hi Chuck.

      I'm actually one of the few people who liked Cloverfield I think. Have you tuned into the end credits of that thing. There's a brilliant end credits piece of music written in the style of an Akira Ifikube's Toho monster fests. Worth a listen.

      Yeah, this is a pretty great film and I enjoy it a lot more than the short story it was based on. Am hoping to watch another TV adaptation of it sometime soon.

      Raimi's excellent Drag Me To Hell is pretty much a rerun of this and worth a watch if you like humour thrown in with your demons.

      Thanks for stopping by.

  4. CLOVERFIELD offended my politics - my Monster Film Politics. I want to see monsters early and often. That's what a monster movie's about, I feel. Not soap opera he-loves-me he-loves-me-not pedal pluckers. I went back to see CLOVERFIELD the next week, thinking I was in a bad mood but I took along a stop-watch, and turned it on when the monster made appearances. 102 total seconds of monster footage. Sheesh. (I see I mistyped '94' minutes for the actual '85' minute running time.)

    I wanted to like it a lot more, but Lack Of Monster Time offended me, and substituting Teen Angst offended me. And women in high-heels volunteering to walk all over Manhattan? Uh. NO. NO. "Shoot me now" would have been their first realistic response. And since the filmmakers tried desperately to achieve "realism", I wondered how Any Man Who Knows Manhattan Women could make such a grievous error.

    I should also say that my Perfect Godzilla Movie is 90 minutes long. Godzilla rises up out of some bay, kicks the bejeepers out of some city for 29 minutes, and swims away. A minute of bubbling. A minute of smoking devastration overviews. Then, we switch to a 2nd bay and Godzilla rises up there, too. Spends another 29 minutes kicking the bejeepers out of City #2. Swims away. Another minute of devastation. He rises up in Bay #3, spends the next 29 minutes destroying everything, and swims away as the credits role.

    The only dialog: screams. Hollers. "No no nooooo!!" No romance. No "He really loves me!" No gangsters in a heist film. No backstabbers. No soap opera wanna-be's. Just a monster, kickin' every model city, stomping every battery powered tank and ripped thru every piano-wire electrical system.

    Chomping trains, sinking ships, radiating army corps - that's fine. Screams and yells are certainly tolerable 'dialog' therefore.


  5. Hi again Chuck,

    Hmmm... it's kinda worrying that you took a stop watch to the theatre.

    I prefer the first wave of Godzilla movies I think. Great scores.